return (pUdp->UDP_CSR[AT91C_EP_OUT] & btReceiveBank);\r
}\r
\r
+/**\r
+ In github PR #129, some users appears to get a false positive from\r
+ usb_poll, which returns true, but the usb_read operation\r
+ still returns 0.\r
+ This check is basically the same as above, but also checks\r
+ that the length available to read is non-zero, thus hopefully fixes the\r
+ bug.\r
+**/\r
+bool usb_poll_validate_length()\r
+{\r
+\r
+ if (!usb_check()) return false;\r
+ if (!(pUdp->UDP_CSR[AT91C_EP_OUT] & btReceiveBank)) return false;\r
+ return (pUdp->UDP_CSR[AT91C_EP_OUT] >> 16) > 0;\r
+}\r
+\r
//*----------------------------------------------------------------------------\r
//* \fn usb_read\r
//* \brief Read available data from Endpoint OUT\r
//*----------------------------------------------------------------------------\r
uint32_t usb_read(byte_t* data, size_t len) {\r
- byte_t bank = btReceiveBank;\r
+ byte_t bank = btReceiveBank;\r
uint32_t packetSize, nbBytesRcv = 0;\r
- uint32_t time_out = 0;\r
+ uint32_t time_out = 0;\r
\r
while (len) {\r
if (!usb_check()) break;\r
\r
if ( pUdp->UDP_CSR[AT91C_EP_OUT] & bank ) {\r
packetSize = MIN(pUdp->UDP_CSR[AT91C_EP_OUT] >> 16, len);\r
- len -= packetSize;\r
+ len -= packetSize;\r
while(packetSize--)\r
data[nbBytesRcv++] = pUdp->UDP_FDR[AT91C_EP_OUT];\r
pUdp->UDP_CSR[AT91C_EP_OUT] &= ~(bank);\r
if (bank == AT91C_UDP_RX_DATA_BK0) {\r
bank = AT91C_UDP_RX_DATA_BK1;\r
- } else {\r
+ } else {\r
bank = AT91C_UDP_RX_DATA_BK0;\r
- }\r
+ }\r
}\r
- if (time_out++ == 0x1fff) break;\r
+ if (time_out++ == 0x1fff) break;\r
}\r
\r
btReceiveBank = bank;\r